Sam’s pay and senior growth case

Nadia [03:17]: the dashboard flagged about $41,000 in duplicate carrier invoices for April—the strongest result to lead with.

Wins you undersold

• [02:46] “the matching step we built” · why it counts — Nadia [03:54]: the dashboard caught $41,000 in duplicate invoices in one month; Nadia [02:23]: the close took four working days instead of six · say it like this — $41,000 in duplicate carrier invoices flagged in one month, and the close shortened by two working days — I built the dashboard and matching.
• [06:17] “I just saw it in the chart and fixed it last week” · why it counts — Nadia [05:49]: your chart ended a twenty-minute discussion in five minutes and let the group decide; Nadia [06:51]: the surcharge mapping was applying the fuel surcharge twice on some regional carriers · on your own initiative · say it like this — A surcharge mapping issue that was applying the charge twice on some regional carriers — I found and fixed it on my own, nobody asked.
• [06:17] “maybe five hundred dollars a day” · why it counts — your estimate of the impact of fixing the duplicate surcharge mapping · on your own initiative · say it like this — About $500 a day from fixing the surcharge mapping that applied the charge twice — I found and fixed it on my own, nobody asked.
• [14:53] “The carrier scorecard runs on its own now, I set up the refresh” · the number that is missing — measure the time Ines no longer spends rebuilding it every Monday; Ines could provide the before-and-after time.

Words that shrink your work

• [02:46] “we built” → “I built”; Nadia [03:54] credited the dashboard as your work.
• [06:17] “I just saw it” → “I found it.”
• [06:17] “maybe five hundred dollars a day” → “about five hundred dollars a day.”
• [14:53] “It’s nothing big” → “I set up the carrier scorecard refresh so it runs on its own.”

What your manager said that counts

• [03:54] Nadia: “That dashboard is your work.” She cited your scoping, building the matching, and working with Ruth’s team to understand the close.
• [04:39] Nadia: “That’s senior-level impact.” She pointed to taking on a messy process, changing how another team works, and being able to say what it saved.
• [05:49] Nadia: your chart showed the surcharge lagging the diesel index by about six weeks; “It ends the argument.”
• [06:51] Nadia: “It was clean enough. Share it next time.”
• [14:23] Nadia: you have “impact beyond our team” and “owning something end to end”; she said the third senior-level criterion, being someone others come to, comes with time.

Promises to you

• Nadia [12:04]: “I’ll put your case into the Q3 window,” with the decision made “by the end of September.” She said the annual raise budget closed in March and she cannot do an off-cycle adjustment now. She is “not promising a number”; the Q3 budget is not yet known.
• Nadia [09:46]: she’ll ask Graham for ten minutes on the June 11 agenda for your dashboard presentation and will help with slides if you want.
• Nadia [15:17]: after you send the exact Pellucid billing export table names, she’ll ask IT about access; “No promises on speed.”

Next 1:1

• Bring the dashboard one-pager due May 22: the close went from six working days to four (Ruth, via Nadia [02:23]); April duplicate invoices were about $41,000 (finance, via Nadia [03:17]).
• Bring the surcharge-mapping impact: your estimate was about $500 a day [06:17].
• Ask about the Q3 compensation case and decision by the end of September.